Yes, The Supreme Court Is Undemocratic

In their excellent recent book on the history of the Constitution, Michael Stokes Paulsen and Luke Paulsen write of this era: "The dominance, supremacy, and near-exclusivity of judicial and especially Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution and the free-wheeling interpretive liberty that accompanied such essentially unrestrained judicial power were new, distinctive, and profoundly important phenomena in the history of the Constitution."

Progressives cheered all the while. They happily pocketed all the court-mandated policy changes to their liking, relieved of the burden of enacting them through democratic means.

Needless to say, the court was never meant to be an unelected lawmaking body, and it has taken on such a highly charged role in our politics, in part, because it arrogated this power to itself.

The court's legitimacy comes from faithfully interpreting laws passed by the legislature and adhering to the Constitution that is the foundational governing document of the country, adopted and amended by "We the People." Anything else is a usurpation.

Source :

Rich Lowry: Yes, the Supreme Court is undemocratic
Convicted criminals heading party is undemocratic: Supreme Court
Stephen L. Carter: Supreme Court makes grievous error on religious freedom
Supreme Court weighs a Trump census question that could undercut California’s power
When Judges Defy the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court should adopt an ethics code
Supreme Court decision on religion is outrageous
Trump's border wall 'emergency' money grab must be blocked by Supreme Court